mouse vegf polyclonal antibodies duo set mouse vegf Search Results


94
R&D Systems goat anti vegf a
Goat Anti Vegf A, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+vegf+polyclonal+antibodies+duo+set+mouse+vegf/Mouse+VEGF+Biotinylated+Antibody/pmc03391601-65-28-30
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
goat anti vegf a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Boster Bio anti vegf rabbit polyclonal ab
Anti Vegf Rabbit Polyclonal Ab, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+vegf+polyclonal+antibodies+duo+set+mouse+vegf/Anti-VEGF%2FVEGFA+Antibody+Picoband/pm32996119-87-25-29
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti vegf rabbit polyclonal ab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Kingfisher Biotech mouse vegf-a polyclonal antibody
Mouse Vegf A Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Kingfisher Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+vegf+polyclonal+antibodies+duo+set+mouse+vegf/Mouse+VEGF-A+Polyclonal+Antibody/custom%40kp0742m%4029765422
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse vegf-a polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti vegf rabbit polyclonal igg
Anti Vegf Rabbit Polyclonal Igg, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+vegf+polyclonal+antibodies+duo+set+mouse+vegf/goat+anti-rabbit+IgG-B/pmc04255045-47-0-7
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti vegf rabbit polyclonal igg - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems biotinylated goat
Biotinylated Goat, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+vegf+polyclonal+antibodies+duo+set+mouse+vegf/Mouse+VEGF-B+186+Biotinylated+Antibody/pmc05135329-419-20-24
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
biotinylated goat - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems vegfr 1 blocking antibody
Vegfr 1 Blocking Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+vegf+polyclonal+antibodies+duo+set+mouse+vegf/Mouse+VEGFR1%2FFlt-1+Antibody/10__1177_slash_1933719114528275-17470-3-7
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
vegfr 1 blocking antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems goat antimouse vegf polyclonal antibody
Figure 2. Temporal induction and regression of the angiogenic response to FGF-2–Matrigel implants. Neovascular basement membrane structures were evaluated in the Matrigel/skin stromal interface using <t>antimouse</t> type IV collagen immunostaining. Matrigel/skin cross-sections were immunostained with anti-type IV collagen to identify stromal neovasculature derived from control implants (MG1hep) or FGF-2 implants (MG1hep1FGF-2) isolated at 4, 7, and 14 days postimplantation. Dermis (D), stromal interface (I), and Matrigel (MG) structures are identified. Arrows depict new vessels in the stromal interface in the FGF-2–containing implant at 4 and 7 days. Note the prominent regression and Matrigel degradation at 14 days postimplantation in the FGF-2–containing implant.
Goat Antimouse Vegf Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+vegf+polyclonal+antibodies+duo+set+mouse+vegf/Mouse+VEGF-D+Antibody/pm11204275-219-16-21
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
goat antimouse vegf polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse polyclonal antibody
Figure 2. Temporal induction and regression of the angiogenic response to FGF-2–Matrigel implants. Neovascular basement membrane structures were evaluated in the Matrigel/skin stromal interface using <t>antimouse</t> type IV collagen immunostaining. Matrigel/skin cross-sections were immunostained with anti-type IV collagen to identify stromal neovasculature derived from control implants (MG1hep) or FGF-2 implants (MG1hep1FGF-2) isolated at 4, 7, and 14 days postimplantation. Dermis (D), stromal interface (I), and Matrigel (MG) structures are identified. Arrows depict new vessels in the stromal interface in the FGF-2–containing implant at 4 and 7 days. Note the prominent regression and Matrigel degradation at 14 days postimplantation in the FGF-2–containing implant.
Mouse Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+vegf+polyclonal+antibodies+duo+set+mouse+vegf/VEGF/pm10800788-49-25-34
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
R&D Systems antibodies against mouse vegf a
Figure 2. Temporal induction and regression of the angiogenic response to FGF-2–Matrigel implants. Neovascular basement membrane structures were evaluated in the Matrigel/skin stromal interface using <t>antimouse</t> type IV collagen immunostaining. Matrigel/skin cross-sections were immunostained with anti-type IV collagen to identify stromal neovasculature derived from control implants (MG1hep) or FGF-2 implants (MG1hep1FGF-2) isolated at 4, 7, and 14 days postimplantation. Dermis (D), stromal interface (I), and Matrigel (MG) structures are identified. Arrows depict new vessels in the stromal interface in the FGF-2–containing implant at 4 and 7 days. Note the prominent regression and Matrigel degradation at 14 days postimplantation in the FGF-2–containing implant.
Antibodies Against Mouse Vegf A, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+vegf+polyclonal+antibodies+duo+set+mouse+vegf/Mouse+VEGF164+Antibody/pmc09019254-353-6-11
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against mouse vegf a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Elabscience Biotechnology anti vegf polyclonal antibody
The sequences of the designed primers
Anti Vegf Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+vegf+polyclonal+antibodies+duo+set+mouse+vegf/VEGF+Polyclonal+Antibody/pmc08520664-42-33-37
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti vegf polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology santa cruz sc 101760 rabbit polyclonal vegfr
The sequences of the designed primers
Santa Cruz Sc 101760 Rabbit Polyclonal Vegfr, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+vegf+polyclonal+antibodies+duo+set+mouse+vegf/VEGFR2/pm32649934-99-33-16
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
santa cruz sc 101760 rabbit polyclonal vegfr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Danaher Inc rabbit polyclonal anti vegf
The sequences of the designed primers
Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Vegf, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+vegf+polyclonal+antibodies+duo+set+mouse+vegf/Rabbit+Polyclonal+Anti-JAK2+(phospho+Y1007)+antibody/pmc07175070-1-0-4
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit polyclonal anti vegf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Figure 2. Temporal induction and regression of the angiogenic response to FGF-2–Matrigel implants. Neovascular basement membrane structures were evaluated in the Matrigel/skin stromal interface using antimouse type IV collagen immunostaining. Matrigel/skin cross-sections were immunostained with anti-type IV collagen to identify stromal neovasculature derived from control implants (MG1hep) or FGF-2 implants (MG1hep1FGF-2) isolated at 4, 7, and 14 days postimplantation. Dermis (D), stromal interface (I), and Matrigel (MG) structures are identified. Arrows depict new vessels in the stromal interface in the FGF-2–containing implant at 4 and 7 days. Note the prominent regression and Matrigel degradation at 14 days postimplantation in the FGF-2–containing implant.

Journal: Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology

Article Title: Fibroblast growth factor 2 activation of stromal cell vascular endothelial growth factor expression and angiogenesis.

doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780212

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. Temporal induction and regression of the angiogenic response to FGF-2–Matrigel implants. Neovascular basement membrane structures were evaluated in the Matrigel/skin stromal interface using antimouse type IV collagen immunostaining. Matrigel/skin cross-sections were immunostained with anti-type IV collagen to identify stromal neovasculature derived from control implants (MG1hep) or FGF-2 implants (MG1hep1FGF-2) isolated at 4, 7, and 14 days postimplantation. Dermis (D), stromal interface (I), and Matrigel (MG) structures are identified. Arrows depict new vessels in the stromal interface in the FGF-2–containing implant at 4 and 7 days. Note the prominent regression and Matrigel degradation at 14 days postimplantation in the FGF-2–containing implant.

Article Snippet: The capture antibody used was the chicken anti-VEGF polyclonal antibody coated at 5 mg/ml and the goat antimouse VEGF polyclonal antibody (R and D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota) used as detection antibody at 5 mg/ml, followed by horseradish peroxidase conjugated antigoat IgG at 0.5 mg/ml (Sigma).

Techniques: Membrane, Immunostaining, Derivative Assay, Control, Isolation

Figure 3. Correlation of VEGF and PECAM-1 immunostaining with FGF-2–containing Matrigel implants. A, Matrigel implants containing Matrigel alone (MG), Matrigel with heparin (MG1hep), and MG with heparin and FGF-2 (MG1hep1FGF-2) were evaluated for the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM-1) at 7 days postimplantation. Note the prominent detection of VEGF (anti-VEGF) in the FGF-2–containing implant stromal interface (arrows). Very little VEGF was detected in the heparin control and none in the Matrigel control. The detection of PECAM-1 (anti-PECAM-1) was also selectively restricted to the highly angiogenic FGF-2–induced stromal interface with both lumenal vascular capillary structures and individual cells invading into the Matrigel matrix (arrows). B, Higher power view of anti-PECAM-1 staining (blue signal) in Matrigel with heparin (MG 1 hep) and Matrigel with heparin and FGF-2 (MG1hep1FGF-2) (original magnification, 3900). Dermal, interface, and Matrigel regions indicated as D, I, and MG, respectively. Arrowheads show PECAM-1 positive capillaries in dermal regions and arrows show PECAM-1 positive vessels in the interface regions. C, Quantification of VEGF and PECAM-1 immunostaining in the FGF-2 and control Matrigel implants at Day 7 postimplantation. The number of positive cells per high-power field were averaged as described in “Materials and Methods.” Statistical significance of the FGF-2 implants compared with the Matrigel 1 heparin control was performed by Student’s t test for n 5 4. * p , 0.05; ** p , 0.001.

Journal: Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology

Article Title: Fibroblast growth factor 2 activation of stromal cell vascular endothelial growth factor expression and angiogenesis.

doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780212

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. Correlation of VEGF and PECAM-1 immunostaining with FGF-2–containing Matrigel implants. A, Matrigel implants containing Matrigel alone (MG), Matrigel with heparin (MG1hep), and MG with heparin and FGF-2 (MG1hep1FGF-2) were evaluated for the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM-1) at 7 days postimplantation. Note the prominent detection of VEGF (anti-VEGF) in the FGF-2–containing implant stromal interface (arrows). Very little VEGF was detected in the heparin control and none in the Matrigel control. The detection of PECAM-1 (anti-PECAM-1) was also selectively restricted to the highly angiogenic FGF-2–induced stromal interface with both lumenal vascular capillary structures and individual cells invading into the Matrigel matrix (arrows). B, Higher power view of anti-PECAM-1 staining (blue signal) in Matrigel with heparin (MG 1 hep) and Matrigel with heparin and FGF-2 (MG1hep1FGF-2) (original magnification, 3900). Dermal, interface, and Matrigel regions indicated as D, I, and MG, respectively. Arrowheads show PECAM-1 positive capillaries in dermal regions and arrows show PECAM-1 positive vessels in the interface regions. C, Quantification of VEGF and PECAM-1 immunostaining in the FGF-2 and control Matrigel implants at Day 7 postimplantation. The number of positive cells per high-power field were averaged as described in “Materials and Methods.” Statistical significance of the FGF-2 implants compared with the Matrigel 1 heparin control was performed by Student’s t test for n 5 4. * p , 0.05; ** p , 0.001.

Article Snippet: The capture antibody used was the chicken anti-VEGF polyclonal antibody coated at 5 mg/ml and the goat antimouse VEGF polyclonal antibody (R and D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota) used as detection antibody at 5 mg/ml, followed by horseradish peroxidase conjugated antigoat IgG at 0.5 mg/ml (Sigma).

Techniques: Immunostaining, Expressing, Control, Staining

Figure 4. Left panel, VEGF and VEGF receptor-2/flk-1 expression in FGF-2–induced angiogenesis detected by in situ hybridization analysis. VEGF was detected with antisense probe (VEGF AS) and sense control (VEGF S) in FGF-2–containing Matrigel implants (7 days). Bright (B.F.) and dark inverted (D.F.) field photographs are presented. Arrows indicate strong focal cell staining. VEGF receptor-2/flk-1 was detected with antisense probe (FLK-1 AS) and sense control (FLK-1 S). Arrows indicate regions of positive staining. Dermis (D), stromal interface (I), and Matrigel (MG) are indicated. Right panel, Quantification of silver grains in the individual regions for VEGF antisense and sense and FLK-1 antisense and sense probes. The average of three fields in each region was measured and antisense compared with sense control for each region by Student’s t test. * p , 0.005.

Journal: Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology

Article Title: Fibroblast growth factor 2 activation of stromal cell vascular endothelial growth factor expression and angiogenesis.

doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780212

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. Left panel, VEGF and VEGF receptor-2/flk-1 expression in FGF-2–induced angiogenesis detected by in situ hybridization analysis. VEGF was detected with antisense probe (VEGF AS) and sense control (VEGF S) in FGF-2–containing Matrigel implants (7 days). Bright (B.F.) and dark inverted (D.F.) field photographs are presented. Arrows indicate strong focal cell staining. VEGF receptor-2/flk-1 was detected with antisense probe (FLK-1 AS) and sense control (FLK-1 S). Arrows indicate regions of positive staining. Dermis (D), stromal interface (I), and Matrigel (MG) are indicated. Right panel, Quantification of silver grains in the individual regions for VEGF antisense and sense and FLK-1 antisense and sense probes. The average of three fields in each region was measured and antisense compared with sense control for each region by Student’s t test. * p , 0.005.

Article Snippet: The capture antibody used was the chicken anti-VEGF polyclonal antibody coated at 5 mg/ml and the goat antimouse VEGF polyclonal antibody (R and D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota) used as detection antibody at 5 mg/ml, followed by horseradish peroxidase conjugated antigoat IgG at 0.5 mg/ml (Sigma).

Techniques: Expressing, In Situ Hybridization, Control, Staining

Figure 5. FGF-2 induces VEGF mRNA and protein in Balb/c 3T3 embryonic fibroblasts. A, Serum-restricted fibroblasts were treated with FGF-2 (10 ng/ml) (F), hypoxia (2% O2) (H), or untreated control (C). Northern blot analysis for VEGF (VEGF) and ribosome-associated protein (36B4) was performed (exposure time: 24 hours). B, VEGF protein secretion from control (2FGF-2) or FGF-2–treated (1FGF-2) Balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts over an 8-hour time period. Triplicate plate conditioned media samples were analyzed by ELISA and represented as average VEGF (ng/ml) 6 SEM. Statistically significant difference from untreated samples (* p , 0.05). C, Transient transfection and transcriptional activation of VEGF-promoter-luciferase reporter construct. Balb/c 3T3 cells were trans- fected in triplicate with either the VEGF promoter-luciferase construct or the pGL3 control vector. Postrecovery (18 hours), cells were treated with FGF-2 (FGF-2), hypoxia, or nothing (Control) for 8 hours. Cell lysates were analyzed for luciferase activity and subtracted from the pGL3 control levels. Data is presented as average light units per mg protein 6 SEM.

Journal: Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology

Article Title: Fibroblast growth factor 2 activation of stromal cell vascular endothelial growth factor expression and angiogenesis.

doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780212

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 5. FGF-2 induces VEGF mRNA and protein in Balb/c 3T3 embryonic fibroblasts. A, Serum-restricted fibroblasts were treated with FGF-2 (10 ng/ml) (F), hypoxia (2% O2) (H), or untreated control (C). Northern blot analysis for VEGF (VEGF) and ribosome-associated protein (36B4) was performed (exposure time: 24 hours). B, VEGF protein secretion from control (2FGF-2) or FGF-2–treated (1FGF-2) Balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts over an 8-hour time period. Triplicate plate conditioned media samples were analyzed by ELISA and represented as average VEGF (ng/ml) 6 SEM. Statistically significant difference from untreated samples (* p , 0.05). C, Transient transfection and transcriptional activation of VEGF-promoter-luciferase reporter construct. Balb/c 3T3 cells were trans- fected in triplicate with either the VEGF promoter-luciferase construct or the pGL3 control vector. Postrecovery (18 hours), cells were treated with FGF-2 (FGF-2), hypoxia, or nothing (Control) for 8 hours. Cell lysates were analyzed for luciferase activity and subtracted from the pGL3 control levels. Data is presented as average light units per mg protein 6 SEM.

Article Snippet: The capture antibody used was the chicken anti-VEGF polyclonal antibody coated at 5 mg/ml and the goat antimouse VEGF polyclonal antibody (R and D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota) used as detection antibody at 5 mg/ml, followed by horseradish peroxidase conjugated antigoat IgG at 0.5 mg/ml (Sigma).

Techniques: Control, Northern Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Transfection, Activation Assay, Luciferase, Construct, Plasmid Preparation, Activity Assay

Figure 6. FGF-2–induced VEGF expression is independent of cell adherence to attach- ment matrices. A, Serum-free Balb/c 3T3 cells were plated onto serum- (Plastic), Matrigel- (ECM), and fibronectin (Fn)-coated plates in the presence (FGF-2) or absence (control) of FGF-2 (10 ng/ml) for 8 hours. Phase photographs denote attachment to all three matrices and activation by FGF-2 (increase in rounded cell morphology). B, Top panel, Northern blot analysis for VEGF and 36B4 control from cells on the indicated matrices in the presence (F) or absence (C) of FGF-2 (10 ng/ml) for 8 hours. Bottom panel, Phosphorimage quantification of the VEGF mRNA signal normalized to the 36B4 control for Balb/c 3T3 cells plated and treated on each indicated matrix. Note the nearly identical FGF-2–induced VEGF mRNA levels for each matrix.

Journal: Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology

Article Title: Fibroblast growth factor 2 activation of stromal cell vascular endothelial growth factor expression and angiogenesis.

doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780212

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 6. FGF-2–induced VEGF expression is independent of cell adherence to attach- ment matrices. A, Serum-free Balb/c 3T3 cells were plated onto serum- (Plastic), Matrigel- (ECM), and fibronectin (Fn)-coated plates in the presence (FGF-2) or absence (control) of FGF-2 (10 ng/ml) for 8 hours. Phase photographs denote attachment to all three matrices and activation by FGF-2 (increase in rounded cell morphology). B, Top panel, Northern blot analysis for VEGF and 36B4 control from cells on the indicated matrices in the presence (F) or absence (C) of FGF-2 (10 ng/ml) for 8 hours. Bottom panel, Phosphorimage quantification of the VEGF mRNA signal normalized to the 36B4 control for Balb/c 3T3 cells plated and treated on each indicated matrix. Note the nearly identical FGF-2–induced VEGF mRNA levels for each matrix.

Article Snippet: The capture antibody used was the chicken anti-VEGF polyclonal antibody coated at 5 mg/ml and the goat antimouse VEGF polyclonal antibody (R and D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota) used as detection antibody at 5 mg/ml, followed by horseradish peroxidase conjugated antigoat IgG at 0.5 mg/ml (Sigma).

Techniques: Expressing, Control, Activation Assay, Northern Blot

Figure 7. Effect of systemic anti-VEGF antibodies on FGF-2–induced angiogenesis in vivo. A, Gross photographs of three representative Matrigel implants containing FGF-2 combined with systemic treatment with nonimmune chicken IgY (Control IgY) and anti-VEGF (Anti-VEGF IgY). Note the lack of associated skin vessel dilation and Matrigel coloration in the anti-VEGF group. B, Histologic evaluation of the stromal and angiogenic response induced by FGF-2 with control and anti-VEGF systemic treatments. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and antimouse type IV collagen (collagen IV) are presented for control IgY (a and b) and anti-VEGF IgY (c and d). Matrigel (MG), stromal interface (I), and dermis (D) are indicated. Inset, Quantification of the angiogenic response in the control and anti-VEGF groups (n 5 10) is expressed as average vessels per field 6 SEM. Statistical difference from control IgG: * p , 0.001.

Journal: Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology

Article Title: Fibroblast growth factor 2 activation of stromal cell vascular endothelial growth factor expression and angiogenesis.

doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780212

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 7. Effect of systemic anti-VEGF antibodies on FGF-2–induced angiogenesis in vivo. A, Gross photographs of three representative Matrigel implants containing FGF-2 combined with systemic treatment with nonimmune chicken IgY (Control IgY) and anti-VEGF (Anti-VEGF IgY). Note the lack of associated skin vessel dilation and Matrigel coloration in the anti-VEGF group. B, Histologic evaluation of the stromal and angiogenic response induced by FGF-2 with control and anti-VEGF systemic treatments. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and antimouse type IV collagen (collagen IV) are presented for control IgY (a and b) and anti-VEGF IgY (c and d). Matrigel (MG), stromal interface (I), and dermis (D) are indicated. Inset, Quantification of the angiogenic response in the control and anti-VEGF groups (n 5 10) is expressed as average vessels per field 6 SEM. Statistical difference from control IgG: * p , 0.001.

Article Snippet: The capture antibody used was the chicken anti-VEGF polyclonal antibody coated at 5 mg/ml and the goat antimouse VEGF polyclonal antibody (R and D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota) used as detection antibody at 5 mg/ml, followed by horseradish peroxidase conjugated antigoat IgG at 0.5 mg/ml (Sigma).

Techniques: In Vivo, Control

The sequences of the designed primers

Journal: Journal of Family & Reproductive Health

Article Title: Effect of Lysophosphatidic Acid on the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression in Autotransplanted Mouse Ovaries Encapsulated in Sodium Alginate

doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v15i2.6449

Figure Lengend Snippet: The sequences of the designed primers

Article Snippet: The cells were permeable by putting the sections in triton X100 (0.3 % for 30 min), washed in PBS and blocked with goat serum (30 min) then, they were incubated with the primary anti-VEGF polyclonal antibody (1:100, Elabscience Biotechnology Co, Wuhan, China) overnight.

Techniques: Sequencing

The fluorescent microscopy observations of transplanted mouse ovarian tissue sections immunostained for VEGF antibody (first row) and phase contrast of the same groups in second row. A and a: Intact control group; B and b: LPA+/LPA-; C and c: LPA-/LPA-. Green color shows the positive cell reaction (white arrow) for VEGF antibody (Bar=50μm). The comparison of the relative expression ratio of Vegf gene to β- actin in transplanted mouse ovaries and intact control group are shown in parts D.

Journal: Journal of Family & Reproductive Health

Article Title: Effect of Lysophosphatidic Acid on the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression in Autotransplanted Mouse Ovaries Encapsulated in Sodium Alginate

doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v15i2.6449

Figure Lengend Snippet: The fluorescent microscopy observations of transplanted mouse ovarian tissue sections immunostained for VEGF antibody (first row) and phase contrast of the same groups in second row. A and a: Intact control group; B and b: LPA+/LPA-; C and c: LPA-/LPA-. Green color shows the positive cell reaction (white arrow) for VEGF antibody (Bar=50μm). The comparison of the relative expression ratio of Vegf gene to β- actin in transplanted mouse ovaries and intact control group are shown in parts D.

Article Snippet: The cells were permeable by putting the sections in triton X100 (0.3 % for 30 min), washed in PBS and blocked with goat serum (30 min) then, they were incubated with the primary anti-VEGF polyclonal antibody (1:100, Elabscience Biotechnology Co, Wuhan, China) overnight.

Techniques: Microscopy, Control, Comparison, Expressing